6

Really... nobody in more than a year was able to explain to me this in a rational way.

Please... I beg you, why 45B and not 45M or 21M or 45.8B? What's the reasoning behind that?

PS: Engineer, nerd, Studio TD in a video game company, I cannot have a proper life if things don't make proper sense xD

4
  • 2
    Hey, welcome to the Cardano StackExchange community! I submitted an edit for your title, mostly just to remove the very serious question part. You never need to put that into a StackExchange question title since all questions on StackExchange are expected to be serious questions.
    – Cavenfish
    May 26 at 19:24
  • 1
    This was an arbitrary decision and can only result in opinion-based responses. Please see this page for details: cardano.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask May 27 at 6:23
  • It is a fact rather than an opinion that it was a relatively arbitrary decision. I doubt it was so arbitrary that the cap could have been set at 100. Maybe my answer is acceptable.
    – gRebel
    May 27 at 7:35
  • Thanks for the edit; I cannot accept an arbitrary decision as an answer. Doesn't make sense to me have in the source code "magic numbers" :) May 27 at 12:43
12

One reason for billions of ADA rather than millions may have been to encourage adoption. Psychologically, people are more likely to buy something when it is perceived as "cheap", and with a large supply of coins, the value of 1 ADA is likely to stay lower, longer (in fiat exchange rates). It also allows people to own whole numbers of tokens, and larger amounts, both psychologically rewarding.

This is my own speculation, @gRebel shared the only official source I have seen.

3
  • 1
    Yup it's why you see these crappy tokens on the BSC set their supply to 1,000,000,000,000 then proceed to burn half.
    – ECMAScript
    May 27 at 8:50
  • Might be a good argument! Thanks for the answer :) May 27 at 12:44
  • It could be an explanation. Especially the beginners are more interested to buy cheap coins. Oct 3 at 21:42
11

Charles Hoskinson stated that it is a fairly arbitrary number in one of his AMAs.

He jokingly explained,

It's because 44 999 999 999 was not enough, and 45 000 000 001 was too much.

With 1 Million Lovelaces per ADA, there is plenty to go around for the foreseeable future.

1
  • Hmm!! that's not acceptable for a guy that says the source code is truth. I simply don't believe him! xD Just in this part :) May 27 at 12:46
6

Cardano is not aiming to simply be a store of value. Utility is key for the project. The goal isn't necessarily to drive the price up into the thousands of dollars.
Also, give the scale of the goals of the project, only having a few million coins wouldn't be condusive to driving adoption.

1
  • 1
    That is also a proper comment, makes sense too! Low coin value make see ADA as utility not store of value. May 27 at 12:45
0

A simple and rational explanation for this lies in the plane of demography. Now the planet Earth is a home for about 8 billion people. Based on this figure, in the future, everyone could potentially have 5-6 whole ADAs, not fractions of it, like many Bitcoin holders have. Psychologically, this is much more pleasant for the holder.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.