1

I used the great guidance on https://developers.cardano.org/docs/get-started/running-cardano to step by step sync with the Cardano mainnet.

Everything went fine and i was almost done untill 2 weekish ago when synching slowed down dramatically (practically halted) on Epoch 289.

Any idea what i can do to resume the final epochs to fully sync with the mainnet?

Thanks

[LAPTOP-0:cardano.node.DnsSubscription:Error:254524] [2021-10-02 21:22:51.50 UTC] Domain: "relays-new.cardano-mainnet.iohk.io" Application Exception: 18.159.65.82:3001 MuxError MuxBearerClosed "<socket: 45> closed when reading data, waiting on next header True" [LAPTOP-0:cardano.node.ErrorPolicy:Warning:108] [2021-10-02 21:22:51.50 UTC] IP 18.159.65.82:3001 ErrorPolicySuspendPeer (Just (ApplicationExceptionTrace (MuxError MuxBearerClosed "<socket: 45> closed when reading data, waiting on next header True"))) 20s 20s [LAPTOP-0:cardano.node.DnsSubscription:Error:254541] [2021-10-02 21:22:51.59 UTC] Domain: "relays-new.cardano-mainnet.iohk.io" Application Exception: 3.127.133.53:3001 MuxError MuxBearerClosed "<socket: 49> closed when reading data, waiting on next header True" [LAPTOP-0:cardano.node.ErrorPolicy:Warning:108] [2021-10-02 21:22:51.59 UTC] IP 3.127.133.53:3001 ErrorPolicySuspendPeer (Just (ApplicationExceptionTrace (MuxError MuxBearerClosed "<socket: 49> closed when reading data, waiting on next header True"))) 20s 20s

1

2 Answers 2

0

Hmm have you looked into your firewall settings? Has anything changed on your local machine?

The timing of the issue would tell me it's a version issue but the instructions you followed would suggest otherwise. Run:

cardano-cli --version

Should be atleast 1.29 to proceed. Also check the version of DB sync as protocol has been extended post-Alonzo.

0

Hi I also had the same issue weeks ago,

it got fixed by following this guide: https://forum.cardano.org/t/solving-the-cardano-node-huge-memory-usage-done/67032

Another thing I also noticed is that it can also be fixed by increasing your swap mem.

However, now I am also having problems with epoch 299 from my db sync.

Upon further inspection it has 570k transactions, which is worse than the epoch you have.

Edit: or it could be your version, since there was the alonzo hardfork as patrick mentioned.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.