Timeline for Is there any limit to the number of UTXO's sitting at a script address?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 3, 2022 at 4:09 | comment | added | Mitchell Turner | I mean when you create any transaction that has an output owned by the script address. I'm using the term "send" loosely. Similar to when you "send" or transfer funds to another wallet. In reality you aren't "sending" it anywhere, you're just creating a new UTxO who's owner is the recipient of the value in the UTxO. Sorry if that was confusing. I was intentionally mixing vernacular to draw parallels. | |
Mar 2, 2022 at 3:53 | comment | added | Jonas | @Mitchell Turner Since the address is just a hashed string of the script attached to a UTXO, it doesn’t specify where the UTXO resides. So, what does it mean when you say “send UTXOs to an address” in the third paragraph? Does it mean that we create a new UTXO using the same hashed script AS the address attached to that new UTXO? | |
Nov 1, 2021 at 21:37 | comment | added | Blake Brown | Thank you! This is exactly the answer I was looking for :) | |
Nov 1, 2021 at 21:36 | vote | accept | Blake Brown | ||
Nov 1, 2021 at 21:17 | history | answered | Mitchell Turner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |