Skip to main content
added 59 characters in body
Source Link

You do not need a static public IP address for each node. You can easily run multiple relays on a single public IP address using different ports (eg. behind NAT/port forwarding).

Eg.

1.2.3.4 port 3001 -> relay 1
1.2.3.4 port 3002 -> relay 2

You could then point all of the hostnames to that IP but you must use the port numbers when connecting/listing them on-chain. Unlike with HTTP where multiple hostnames can run on a single IP/port (using the HOST header), that's not the case here.

Of course to do this, you'd need to be able to forward the ports from the device with that IP so this may depend on your exact setup (but a home router likely can do this with its port forwarding - that's what I'm usingI did exactly this with my first testnet pool, having two relays running at home).

Your relays/producer will still need some static internal IP address/hostname that they can connect to each other on (since they will need to be listed in each others topology files).

You do not need a static public IP address for each node. You can easily run multiple relays on a single public IP address using different ports (eg. behind NAT/port forwarding).

Eg.

1.2.3.4 port 3001 -> relay 1
1.2.3.4 port 3002 -> relay 2

You could then point all of the hostnames to that IP but you must use the port numbers when connecting/listing them on-chain. Unlike with HTTP where multiple hostnames can run on a single IP/port (using the HOST header), that's not the case here.

Of course to do this, you'd need to be able to forward the ports from the device with that IP so this may depend on your exact setup (but a home router likely can do this with its port forwarding - that's what I'm using).

Your relays/producer will still need some static internal IP address/hostname that they can connect to each other on (since they will need to be listed in each others topology files).

You do not need a static public IP address for each node. You can easily run multiple relays on a single public IP address using different ports (eg. behind NAT/port forwarding).

Eg.

1.2.3.4 port 3001 -> relay 1
1.2.3.4 port 3002 -> relay 2

You could then point all of the hostnames to that IP but you must use the port numbers when connecting/listing them on-chain. Unlike with HTTP where multiple hostnames can run on a single IP/port (using the HOST header), that's not the case here.

Of course to do this, you'd need to be able to forward the ports from the device with that IP so this may depend on your exact setup (but a home router likely can do this with its port forwarding - I did exactly this with my first testnet pool, having two relays running at home).

Your relays/producer will still need some static internal IP address/hostname that they can connect to each other on (since they will need to be listed in each others topology files).

added 369 characters in body
Source Link

You do not need a static public IP address for each node. You can easily run multiple relays on a single public IP address using different ports (eg. behind NAT/port forwarding).

Eg.

1.2.3.4 port 3001 -> relay 1
1.2.3.4 port 3002 -> relay 2

You could then point all of the hostnames to that IP but you must use the port numbers when connecting/listing them on-chain. Unlike with HTTP where multiple hostnames can run on a single IP/port (using the HOST header), that's not the case here.

Of course to do this, you'd need to be able to forward the ports from the device with that IP so this may depend on your exact setup (but a home router likely can do this with its port forwarding - that's what I'm using).

Your relays/producer will still need some static internal IP address/hostname that they can connect to each other on (since they will need to be listed in each others topology files).

You do not need a static public IP address for each node. You can easily run multiple relays on a single public IP address using different ports (eg. behind NAT/port forwarding).

Eg.

1.2.3.4 port 3001 -> relay 1
1.2.3.4 port 3002 -> relay 2

Of course to do this, you'd need to be able to forward the ports so this may depend on your exact setup.

Your relays/producer will still need some static internal IP address/hostname that they can connect to each other on (since they will need to be listed in each others topology files).

You do not need a static public IP address for each node. You can easily run multiple relays on a single public IP address using different ports (eg. behind NAT/port forwarding).

Eg.

1.2.3.4 port 3001 -> relay 1
1.2.3.4 port 3002 -> relay 2

You could then point all of the hostnames to that IP but you must use the port numbers when connecting/listing them on-chain. Unlike with HTTP where multiple hostnames can run on a single IP/port (using the HOST header), that's not the case here.

Of course to do this, you'd need to be able to forward the ports from the device with that IP so this may depend on your exact setup (but a home router likely can do this with its port forwarding - that's what I'm using).

Your relays/producer will still need some static internal IP address/hostname that they can connect to each other on (since they will need to be listed in each others topology files).

added 8 characters in body
Source Link

You do not need a static public IP address for each node. You can easily run multiple relays on a single public IP address using different ports (eg. behind NAT/port forwarding).

Eg.

1.2.3.4 port 3001 -> relay 1 1.2.3.4 port 3002 -> relay 2

1.2.3.4 port 3001 -> relay 1
1.2.3.4 port 3002 -> relay 2

Of course to do this, you'd need to be able to forward the ports so this may depend on your exact setup.

Your relays/producer will still need some static internal IP address/hostname that they can connect to each other on (since they will need to be listed in each others topology files).

You do not need a static public IP address for each node. You can easily run multiple relays on a single public IP address using different ports (eg. behind NAT/port forwarding).

Eg.

1.2.3.4 port 3001 -> relay 1 1.2.3.4 port 3002 -> relay 2

Of course to do this, you'd need to be able to forward the ports so this may depend on your exact setup.

Your relays/producer will still need some static internal IP address/hostname that they can connect to each other on (since they will need to be listed in each others topology files).

You do not need a static public IP address for each node. You can easily run multiple relays on a single public IP address using different ports (eg. behind NAT/port forwarding).

Eg.

1.2.3.4 port 3001 -> relay 1
1.2.3.4 port 3002 -> relay 2

Of course to do this, you'd need to be able to forward the ports so this may depend on your exact setup.

Your relays/producer will still need some static internal IP address/hostname that they can connect to each other on (since they will need to be listed in each others topology files).

Source Link
Loading